8 posts tagged with "Naming"

The question: A typography overhaul this large can't safely be edited in place on the live control. How do we build and prove it without risking every site, and without leaving a messy v1 / v2 / v3 option-type namespace behind?

The question: qTip2 has been unmaintained since 2016, and we replaced it with Floating UI. The old implementation put its vendor everywhere — .qtip-fw class names, a 'qtip' script handle, $.fn.qtip(). Do we carry that naming over to the new library and call things floating-ui, or name them something else?

The question: The [newsletter] element already renders a form, validates a signup and emails the site admin — but nothing stores it. Building that storage layer means choosing a shape now that still works when campaigns, automations, contact timelines and Mailchimp/MailerLite/Brevo sync arrive. So: custom post type or custom tables? And once that is settled, how are lists, tags and segments modelled — because that is the decision that is expensive to reverse.

The question: As the AI Dev Kit grew, its root filled with a mix of hand-authored files and machine-fetched folders. Should the fetched/assembled folders be collected into one directory — and if so, what should it be called?

The question: The new Card Rows designer lives on a Card tab, but the reusable border/corners/shadow/fill preset you apply to that card is called Box Style (from Box Presets). That looked inconsistent — should we rename everything to one word ("Box tab / Box Rows", or "Card Box Style / Card Box Presets")?

The question: the compact rounded-label shortcode — sub-tag, message, leading/trailing icons, optional link — was called announcement_pill. It renders status badges, "what's new" hero chips, eyebrow labels and announcement bars. Is "announcement pill" the right name for it, or should it be badge — and if we rename, do we need a migration?

The question: every new content library (page-builder templates, then component presets, then icon packs) was about to get its own GitHub data repo. That felt messy. Can we put all library content in one repo — and if so, what actually has to stay split?

The question: UnysonPlus is a fresh restart of Unyson. The rich typography control shipped as typography-v2 while the original typography was a weaker, older implementation. Do we upgrade typography-v2 in place, or promote it to the clean typography name and scrap the -v2 suffix?